INTRODUCTION xix Scottish Literature, but Fountainhall would be a work rather too heavy for our limited funds, although few can be concerned which would come more legitimately under the purpose of our association, which is made in order to rescue from the chance of destruction the documents most essential to the history and literature of Scotland. 1 We are having a meeting on the 4th July, when 1 will table the subject, and if we possibly C&n assist in bringing out the worthy Judge in good stile, we will be most ready to co-operate with your pious endeavours to that effect. I should wish to hear from you before that time what you would wish to be done in the matter respecting the size, number of the impression, and so forth. \Vbatever lies in my limited power will be gladly contributed by, dear sir, your very faithful servant, `YALTER SCOTT. `Castle Street, 18 June 1825: And in answer to further inquiry he again wrote on 10th July 1823 DEAR SIR THo,.IAs,- Y OU are too easily alarmed about the fate of your ancestors. 1 did not mean it would not be published -far less that I would not do all in my power to advance the publication-but only that the size and probable expense of the work, with the limited sale for articles of literature only interesting to the Scottish Antiquaries, rendered the Booksellers less willing to adopt the proposal than they seemed nt first. However 1 thought it as well to wait until Constable himself came down from London, as 1 had only spoken w ith his partner, and 1 have since seen him, and find him well disposed to the undertaking. 1 told him 1 would give with the greatest pleasure any assistance in my power in the way of historical illustration, and that 1 conc1uded that y ou, to w hom the work unquestionably belongs, would con- tribute a life of the venerable Lawy er and some account of his family, ~Ir. Thomson has promised to look through the Manu- script and collate it w ith that of hir. Maule. and is of opinion (as I am) that it would be very desirable to retrench all the mere law questions which are to be found in the printed folios. Indeed the Editors of those two volumes had a purpose in view directly opposed to ours, for they wished to omit historical and domestic anecdotes and give the law cases as unmixed as possible, while it would be our object doubtless to exclude the mere law questions